delivered in Acceptance of
Your Majesty, members of the Royal Family, Mr. Chairman, ladies and
Before I left South Africa, a land I love passionately, we had an emergency meeting of the executive committee of the South African Council of Churches with the leaders of our member churches. We called the meeting because of the deepening crisis in our land, which has claimed nearly two hundred lives this year alone. We visited some of the trouble spots on the Witwatersrand. I went with others to the East Rand. We visited the home of an old lady. She told us that she looked after her grandson and the children of neighbors while their parents were at work. One day the police chased some pupils who had been boycotting classes, but they disappeared between the township houses. The police drove down the old lady's street. She was sitting at the back of the house in her kitchen, while her charges were playing in the yard in front of the house. Her daughter rushed into the house, calling out to her to come quickly. The old lady dashed out of the kitchen into the living room. Her grandson had fallen just inside the door, dead. He had been shot in the back by the police. He was six years old. A few weeks later, a white mother, trying to register her black servant for work, drove through a black township. Black rioters stoned her car and killed her baby of a few months old, the first white casualty of the current unrest in South Africa. Such deaths are two too many. These are part of the high cost of apartheid.
Every day in a squatter camp near Cape Town called KTC, the
authorities have been demolishing flimsy plastic shelters which black mothers
have erected because they were taking their marriage vows seriously. They have
been reduced to sitting on soaking mattresses, with their household effects
strewn round their feet, and whimpering babies on their laps, in the cold Cape
winter rain. Every day the authorities have carried out these callous
demolitions. What heinous crime have these women committed, to be hounded like
criminals in this manner? All they have wanted is to be with their husbands, the
fathers of their children. Everywhere else in the world they would be highly
commended, but in South Africa, a land which claims to be Christian and which
boasts a public holiday called Family Day, these gallant women are treated so
inhumanely. Yet all they want is to have a decent and stable family life.
Unfortunately, in the land of their birth it is a criminal offense for them to
live happily with their husbands and the fathers of their children. Black family
life is thus being undermined, not accidentally but by deliberate government
policy. It is part of the price human beings, God's children, are called to pay
for apartheid. An unacceptable price.
I come from a beautiful land, richly endowed by God with wonderful natural resources, wide expanses, rolling mountains, singing, birds, bright shining stars out of blue skies, with radiant sunshine, gold sunshine. There is enough of the good things that come from God's bounty, there is enough for everyone, but apartheid has confirmed some in their selfishness, causing them to grasp readily a disproportionate share, the lion's share, because of their power. They have taken 87 percent of the land, though being only about 20 percent of our population. The rest have had to make do with the remaining 13 percent. Apartheid has decreed the politics of exclusion: 73 percent of the population is excluded from any meaningful participation in the political decision-making processes of the land of their birth. The new constitution, making provision for three chambers, for whites, Coloreds and Indians, mentions blacks only once and thereafter ignores them completely. Thus this new constitution, lauded in parts of the West as a step in the right direction, entrenches racism and ethnicity. The constitutional committees are composed in the ratio of four whites to two Coloreds to one Indian-zero black... Hence this constitution perpetuates by law and entrenches white minority rule.
Blacks are expected to exercise their political ambitions in
unviable, poverty-stricken, arid bantustan homelands, ghettos of misery,
inexhaustible reservoirs of cheap black labor, bantustans into which South
Africa is being balkanzied. Blacks are systematically being stripped of their
South African citizenship and being turned into aliens in the land of their
birth. [Connie Mulder, Minister of Bantu Administration and Development (BAD),
said in 1978: 'If our policy is taken to its logical conclusion... there will
not be one black man with South African citizenship... Every black man in South
Africa will eventually be accommodated in some independent new state in this
honorable way and there will no longer be a moral obligation on this parliament
to accommodate these people politically.' (South African Hansard, proceedings of
the South African parliament, Cape Town, February 7, 1978, quoted by legal
academic John Dugard and reproduced in The Apartheid Handbook, by Roger Omond,
Penguin 1985.)]. This is apartheid's final solution, just as Nazism had its
final solution for the Jews in Hitler's Aryan madness. The South African
government is smart. Aliens can claim but very few rights, least of all
In pursuance of apartheid's ideological racist dream, over three million of God's children have been uprooted from their homes, which have been demolished, while they have been dumped in the bantustan homeland resettlement camps. I say dumped advisedly: only rubbish or things are dumped, not human beings. Apartheid has, however, ensured that God's children, just because they are black, should be treated as if they were things and not as of infinite value as being created in the image of God. These dumping grounds are far from where work and food can be procured easily. Children starve, suffer from the often irreversible consequences of malnutrition. This happens to them not accidentally but by deliberate government policy. They starve in a land that could be the bread basket of Africa, a land that normally is a net exporter of food.
The father leaves his family in the bantustan homeland, there eking out a miserable existence, while he, if he is lucky, goes to the so-called white man's town as a migrant, to live an unnatural life in a single-sex hostel for eleven months, being prey there to drunkenness, prostitution and worse. This migratory labor policy is declared government policy and has been condemned as a cancer in our society even by the white Dutch Reformed Church-not noted for being quick to criticize the government. This cancer, eating away at the vitals of black family life, is deliberate government policy. It is part of the cost of apartheid, exorbitant in terms of human suffering.
Apartheid has spawned discriminatory education such as Bantu education, education for serfdom, ensuring that the government spends only about one-tenth on a black child per annum for education of what it spends on a white child. It is education that is decidedly separate and unequal. It is to be wantonly wasteful of human resources, because so many of God's children are prevented, by deliberate government policy, from attaining their fullest potential. South Africa is paying a heavy price already for this iniquitous policy, because there is a desperate shortage of skilled manpower, a direct result of the shortsighted schemes of the racist regime. It is a moral universe that we inhabit, and good and right and equity matter in the universe of the God we worship. And so, in this matter, the South African government and its supporters are being properly hoisted with their own petard.
Apartheid is upheld by a phalanx of iniquitous laws, such as the
Population Registration Act, which decrees that all South Africans must be
classified ethnically and duly registered according to these race categories.
Many times, in the same family one child has been classified white while another
with a slightly darker hue has been classified Colored, with all the horrible
consequences for the latter of being shut out from membership of a greatly
privileged caste. There have, as a result, been several child suicides. This is
too high a price to pay for racial purity, for it is doubtful whether any end,
however desirable, can justify such a means. There are laws, such as the
Prohibition of Mixed Marriages Act, which regard marriages between a white and a
person of another race as illegal. Race becomes as impediment to a valid
marriage. Two persons who have fallen in love are prevented by race from
consummating their love in the marriage bond. Something beautiful is made to be
sordid and ugly. The Immorality Act decrees that fornication and adultery are
illegal if they happen between a white and one of another race. The police are
reduced to the level of Peeping Toms to catch couples red-handed. Many whites
have committed suicide rather than face the disastrous consequences that follow
in the train of even just being charged under this law. The cost is too great
Such an evil system, totally indefensible by normally acceptable methods, relies on a whole phalanx of draconian laws such as the security legislation which is almost peculiar to South Africa. There are the laws which permit the indefinite detention of persons whom the Minister or Law and Order has decided are a threat to the security of the state. They are detained at his pleasure, in solitary confinement, without access to their family, their own doctor, or a lawyer. That is severe punishment when the evidence apparently available to the minister has not been tested in an open court-perhaps it could stand up to such rigorous scrutiny, perhaps not; we are never to know. It is a far too convenient device for a repressive regime. The minister would have to be extra special not to succumb to the temptation to circumvent the awkward process of testing his evidence in an open court; and thus he lets his power under the law be open to the abuse where he is both judge and prosecutor. Many, too many, have died mysteriously in detention. All this is too costly in terms of human lives. The minister is able, too, to place people under banning orders without being subjected to the annoyance of the checks and balances of due process. A banned person for three or five years becomes a nonperson who cannot be quoted during the period of her banning order. She cannot attend a gathering, which means more than one other person. Two persons together talking to a banned person are a gathering! She cannot attend the wedding or funeral of even her own child without special permission. She must be at home from 6 p.m. of one day to 6 a.m. of the next, on all public holidays and from 6 p.m. on Fridays until 6 a.m. on Mondays. She cannot go on holiday outside the magisterial area to which she has been confined. She cannot go to the cinema, or to a picnic. That is severe punishment, inflicted without the evidence allegedly justifying it being made available to the banned person, or having it scrutinized in a court of law. It is serious erosion and violation of basic human rights, of which blacks have precious few in the land of their birth. They do not enjoy the rights of freedom of movement and association. They do not enjoy security of tenure, the right to participate in the making of decisions that affect their lives. In short, this land, richly endowed in so many ways, is sadly lacking in justice.
Once a Zambian and a South African, it is said, were talking. The
Zambian boasted about their Minister of Naval Affairs. The South African asked,
'But you have no navy, no access to the sea. How then can you have a Minister of
Naval Affairs?' The Zambian retorted: 'Well, in South Africa you have a Minister
of Justice, don't you?'
It is against this system that our people have sought to protest peacefully since 1912 at least, with the founding of the African National Congress. They have used the conventional methods of peaceful protest-petitions, demonstrations, deputations, and even a passive resistance campaign. A tribute to our people's commitment to peaceful change is the fact that the only South Africans to win the Nobel Peace Prize are both black. [The other South African Peace Laureate had been Chief Albert Luthuli, President General of the African National Congress, in 1960.] Our people are peace-loving to a fault. The response of the authorities has been an escalating intransigence and violence, the violence of police dogs, tear gas, detention without trial, exile, and even death. Our people protested peacefully against the pass laws in 1960 and 69 of them were killed on March 21, 1960, at Sharpeville, many shot in the back running away. our children protested against inferior education, singing songs and displaying placards and marching peacefully. Many in 1976, on June 16 and subsequent times, were killed or imprisoned. Over 500 people died in that uprising. many children went into exile. The whereabouts of many are unknown to their parents. At present, to protest that selfsame discriminatory education and the exclusion of blacks from the new constitutional dispensation, the sham local black government, rising unemployment, increased rents and General Sales Tax, our people have boycotted and demonstrated. They have staged a successful two-day stay-away. Over 150 people have been killed. It is far too high a price to pay. There has been little revulsion or outrage in the West at this wanton destruction of human life.
In parenthesis, can somebody please explain to me something that has puzzled me? When a priest goes missing and is subsequently found dead, the media in the West carry his story in very extensive coverage. [A reference to the abduction and murder of Father Jerzy Popieluszko by the Polish secret police in October 1984.] I am glad that the death of one person can cause so much concern. But in the selfsame week when this priest is found dead, the South African police kill 24 blacks who had been participating in a protest, 6,000 blacks are sacked for being similarly involved, and you are lucky to get that much coverage. Are we being told something I do not want to believe, that we blacks are expendable and that blood is thicker than water, that when it comes to the crunch, you cannot trust whites, that they will club together against us? I don't want to believe that this is the message being conveyed to us.
Be that as it may, we see before us a land bereft of much justice, and therefore without peace and security. Unrest is endemic and will remain an unchanging feature of the South African scene until apartheid, the root cause of it all, is finally dismantled. At this time the army is being quartered on the civilian population. There is a civil war being waged. South Africans are on either side. When the ANC and the PAC were banned in 1960, they declared that they had no option but to carry out the armed struggle. We in the SACC have said that we are opposed to all forms of violence-that of a repressive and unjust system and that of those who seek to overthrow that system. However, we have added that we understand those who say that they have had to adopt what is a last resort for them. Violence is not being introduced into the South African situation de novo from outside by those who are called terrorists or freedom fighters, depending on whether you are oppressed or an oppressor. The South African situation is violent already and the primary violence is that of apartheid, the violence of forced population removals, of inferior education, of detention without trial, of the migratory labor system, etc.
There is a war on the border of our country. South African faces
fellow South African. South African soldiers are fighting against Namibians who
oppose the illegal occupation of their country by South Africa, which has sought
to extend its repressive systems of apartheid, unjust and exploitative.
There is no peace in Southern Africa. There is no peace because there is no justice. There can be no real peace and security until there be first justice enjoyed by all the inhabitants of that beautiful land. The Bible knows nothing about peace without justice, for that would be crying, "Peace, peace, where there is no peace." God's shalom peace, involves inevitably righteousness, justice, wholeness, fullness of life, participation in decision making, goodness, laughter, joy, compassion, sharing and reconciliation.
I have spoken extensively about South Africa, first because it is the land I know best, but because it is also a microcosm of the world and an example of what is to be found in other lands in differing degree-when there is injustice, invariably peace becomes a casualty. In El Salvador, in Nicaragua and elsewhere in Latin America, there have been repressive regimes which have aroused opposition in those countries. Fellow citizens are pitted against one another, sometimes attracting the unhelpful attention and interest of outside powers, who want to extend their spheres of influence. We see this in the Middle East, in Korea, in the Philippines, in Kampuchea, in Vietnam, in Ulster, in Afghanistan, in Mozambique, in Angola, in Zimbabwe, behind the Iron Curtain.
Because there is global insecurity, nations are engaged in a mad arms race, spending billions of dollars wastefully on instruments of destruction, when millions are starving. And yet, just a fraction of what is expended so obscenely on defense budgets would make the difference in enabling God's children to fill their stomachs, be educated and given the chance to lead fulfilled and happy lives. We have the capacity to feed ourselves several times over but we are daily haunted by the spectacle of the gaunt dregs of humanity shuffling along in endless queues, with bowls to collect what the charity of the world has provided, too little too late. When will we learn, when will the people of the world get up and say, enough is enough? God created us for fellowship. God created us so that we should form the human family, existing together because we were made for one another. We are not made for an exclusive self-sufficiency but for interdependence, and we break that law of our being at our peril. When will we learn that an escalating arms race merely escalates global insecurity? We are now much closer to a nuclear holocaust than when our technology and our spending were less.
Unless we work assiduously so that all of God's children, our
brothers and sisters, members of our one human family, enjoy the basic human
rights, the right to a fulfilled life, the right of movement, the freedom to be
fully human within a humanity measured by nothing less than the humanity of
Jesus Christ himself, then we are on the road inexorably to self-destruction, we
are not far from global suicide. And yet it could be so different.
When will we learn that human beings are of infinite value because they have been created in the image of God, that it is blasphemy to treat them as if they were less than this, and to do so ultimately recoils on those who do this? In dehumanizing others, they are themselves dehumanized. Perhaps oppression dehumanizes the oppressor as much as, if not more than, the oppressed. They need each other to become truly free, to become human. We can be human only in fellowship, in community, in koinonia , in peace.
Let us work to be peacemakers, those given a wonderful share in our Lord's ministry of reconciliation. If we want peace, so we have been told, let us work for justice. Let us beat our swords into plowshares.
God calls us to be fellow workers with him so that we can extend his kingdom of shalom, of justice, of goodness, of compassion, of caring, of sharing, of laughter, joy and reconciliation, so that the kingdoms of this world will become the Kingdom of our God and of his Christ, and he shall reign forever and ever. Amen. Then there will be fulfillment of the wonderful vision in the Revelation of St. John the Divine (Revelation 7:9ff).
1984, Oslo, Norway]